|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 4 posts ] |
|
Author |
Message |
PeterScott
Heinlein Nexus
Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 8:10 am Posts: 2236 Location: Pacific NorthWest
|
Hello, Dora
|
Fri May 29, 2009 8:22 am |
|
|
JamesGifford
PITA Bred
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 12:17 pm Posts: 2402 Location: The Quiet Earth
|
Re: Hello, Dora
This and Bing are going to change the shape of online search. Both put more integration into the search and results presentation, relieving the user of the need to drill into each result page and put together their own summary.
Google will actually do a great deal of what these new sites do, but it's not as smooth or commonly known. Go ahead and put an equation, a phone number, a UPS tracking number into Google. It does an amazing amount of stuff beyond simple searching, but hardly anyone knows it.
My bet at the moment is that Bing will displace Google. From what I've seen, Microsoft scored one of its rare triumphs there. Wolfram|Alpha, right from the name, is too offputting and science/tech/geek oriented for mass acceptance. (Once again, engineers come up with a really kewl idea and then forget that the mass user base is not technogeeks.)
_________________ "Hier stehe ich. Ich kann nicht anders." - Luther In the end, I found Heinlein is finite. Thus, finite analysis is needed.
|
Fri May 29, 2009 9:35 am |
|
|
PeterScott
Heinlein Nexus
Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 8:10 am Posts: 2236 Location: Pacific NorthWest
|
Re: Hello, Dora
|
Fri May 29, 2009 11:06 am |
|
|
JamesGifford
PITA Bred
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 12:17 pm Posts: 2402 Location: The Quiet Earth
|
Re: Hello, Dora
My point is that WA (and Bing, and Ask Jeeves, and the other high-integration search sites) aren't doing anything really new here. They're packaging the output in novel ways. If WA retains its academic science facade and thrust, I wonder how successful it will be over time, as the general population won't find it appealing and the university crowd tends to disdain canned answers. I've no doubt that WA will find a level of acceptance about like Wikipedia - good enough, if you're not too picky, but with flaws in its search and integration if you are an expert or other demanding user.
Success is important because at some point, these portal/tools are supposed to make their inventor owners gobs of money. (I still have trouble seeing HOW, exactly, but that's just me.) So if WA achieves its lofty goals but remains a minor player in the infosearch game, it will have few prospects for associated advertising and the scanty other ways free web sites can generate revenue.
|
Fri May 29, 2009 11:42 am |
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 4 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|